Analyze landmark cases and judicial precedents to evaluate their broader impact on international legal frameworks.
Engage in critical discussion by questioning judicial reasoning, deconstructing dissenting opinions, and weighing legal principles.
Advanced Passive Structures with Reporting Verbs
Used to maintain objective distance and present case facts or judicial findings from an impartial perspective.
It-Structures: It was held that…, It is widely alleged that…, It has been established that… (e.g., “It was held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer.”).
Subject-Structures: The defendant is said to have…, The statute is deemed to be… (e.g., “The company was deemed to have acted in bad faith.”).
Judicial Principles & Precedent
Precedent
Stare decisis
Ratio decidendi
Obiter dicta
Landmark case
Binding authority
Persuasive authority
The Analytical Process
To uphold a decision
To overturn / reverse a ruling
To distinguish a case
To dismiss (an appeal, a case)
Case Components & Opinions
Material facts
Holding
Dissenting opinion
Concurring opinion
Legal reasoning
Phrases for Critical Discussion
The court reasoned that…
The central issue before the court was…
This case is clearly distinguishable from…